When I write about my concerns about the South Shore Expansions, this is part of what I’m thinking:
The article talks about how a system which was built around people going to downtown San Francisco for work or entertainment is unable to operate without massive subsidies because few people go to downtown San Francisco anymore. They work at home, they live away from the city, and there’s no real reason to go to the city anymore.
The interesting part to me is the difference between the buses and the railroads. Buses can be reduced somewhat and made to work after a fashion – I’ve seen this in Chicago after a couple of cutbacks. Rail, on the other hand, gets hit more severely by cutbacks because of the fixed costs and their dependence on density of travel – cut back on that, and there’s no real way to inexpensively counterbalance those cutbacks.
And the cutbacks can be huge – while it’s no real issue with ferry service not expanding as planned (we’ll just do with what we have for the moment, expand when we can if we can), two of the rail systems are facing crippling cutbacks. BART can be cut back to a three-line system, but the reduction of service that such a(n efficient) schedule implies and the fact that two major parts of the systems (Berkley and San Jose) will no longer have direct access to San Francisco will add inconvenience to a system with precious little redundancy, and after a 2.6 Billion upgrade to electric service on their line from San Francisco to Gilroy, Caltrain may be unable to make use of the newly electrified line’s advantages.
It’s the Caltrain work that interests me most, as we’re talking about improving a line so that it can keep up with foreseen future demand, only to find out that that demand will not be coming. 2.6 billion dollars of work done for benefits that have turned out to be useless.
This, of course, could not have been foreseen five-ten years ago – before Trump, before Covid, before remote working allowed the discovery of rural places with cheap housing and a slower pace of living that made the area’s major cities look like the unaffordable dumps that they were not allowed to be acknowledged as before. During the planning stage, all thoughts were to strengthen and empower the connections to both San Francisco and San Jose; to realize the circumstances would make such efforts unnecessary would have meant an ability to see into a future that didn’t look like an extrapolation of the present they were living in.
There were other transit expansions that were planned and carried out during this time. Marin County got their rail line that runs through to the ferry docks that are closest to San Francisco, and San Francisco finally got an extension of a tram line underground through downtown with the possibility of going through to the north side of San Francisco. BART has made a few expansion over the years (including one getting within reach of San Jose) and there’s a proposal to take BART into and through Downtown San Jose.
And all these extensions may prove to have been unnecessary, thanks to changes wrought by the past few years.
What does this have to do with The South Shore Line Construction? Quite a bit, if you ask me.
Quite simply, we’re talking about a bunch of construction based on the idea that people would still go to Chicago for stuff, especially high-level work, and then head back to Indiana for the lower taxes and lower gas prices (and a lower level of service, but then if you don’t NEED those services…). Doubling the line from Gary to Michigan City means more (and faster) trains down the main line, allows for schedules based on regular intervals (memory, or clock face scheduling) and the possibility of decent intra-regional service (from Hammond to Michigan City and perhaps to South Bend); while a new line down to the Dyer/Munster Border will expand the service area in both Indiana and Illinois. Either way, we’re talking about a commuter railroad rebuilt with the idea of faster, better, car-free access to downtown Chicago – again, an idea that made sense in the world from before 2016 and may not make any sense in the world in 2023 and beyond.
Now, what if the expansions turn out to be unnecessary?
What if the present logjam of traffic going into Indiana is as bad as it’s going to get because the number of people driving into Indiana from Chicago turns out to be dropping? What if the main line ends up no longer able to draw the people that it had before, when the planners seemed forced to plan for expanding the main line? They can have their memory schedules, but when the level of boardings remains below their worst-case scenarios we’re having a line that was gilded for no use.
I can see the line to the Dyer/Munster border become unused the day it opens to service. It may have use as a freight connection (and I’d suggest that NICTD add connections for that purpose), but I can see the passenger stations left alone without any real use after being built.
All this because of COVID-19 and its effects. All this because anyone who can work at home wants very much to do that.
Consider that for every essential worker who was thankful for being able to go out to work, there were ten essential workers who wished they could stay (or go) home and five office workers who found working at home an absolute boon to their world. Those workers suddenly working from home got the ability to sleep a bit later than usual, the ability to dress much more casually than they could have gotten away with before, no commutes burning time and vehicle use, no need for overpriced, overtaxed lunches downtown (if they pay extra, it’s for food delivery), no need to deal with social cues or other issues of the office, and all the extra money and time gained from working at home instead of at a distant office. One could even take vacations, doing the work (either part-time or full-time) during the day and do one’s fun activities during the evening.
And where does that leave NICTD? With a setup of white elephants on a scale similar to the 2.8 billion spent on CalTrain for an Electrification that looks like it won’t be worth it. Imagine a group of underused facilities, or facilities which go from mainly passenger rail to almost exclusively freight rail, with the passenger aspect either set aside or stopped fully with the station platforms becoming obstacles for the freight lines (until they’re removed).
And that is what concerns me about this.